Original authors can specify the criteria any replication study should meet. Conceptual replications test the underlying hypothesis of the original study by using a different method or measure and are needed to validate and expand previous findings (Marsden et al., 2018). From analysing the results, the test . A conceptual replication attempts to reproduced the hypothesis, or basic goal, of the prior study by using different procedures. The purpose of this post is to argue that we can only learn anything of value—whether it is from an original study, an exact replication, or a conceptual replication—if we can trust the data. There is no "replicability crisis" per se, but there is an enormous . Conceptual replication means that researchers re-test the same theoretical idea or hypothesis repeatedly, but use different populations, different ways of manipulating variables, different ways of measuring variables, or using different study designs. The term "conceptual replication" has been applied to studies that use different methods to test the same question as a prior study. Our hypothesis is that, like L1 speakers, L2 learners make simulations of object orientation and size during sentence comprehension. The replication study differed from the initial randomized controlled trial on three important elements: geographical region, timing of the intervention, and instructional context of the counterfactual. (2012).
It may be seen as the act of repeating an experimental procedure with the aim of establishing the truth. PLoS ONE 16(4): e0247855. We present a fully preregistered, high-powered conceptual replication of Experiment 1 by Smith, Tracy, and Murray (1993). Replication Article Reflections on the replication corner: In praise of conceptual replications☆,☆☆ John G. Lynch, Jr. a,⁎, Eric T. Bradlow b, Joel C. Huber c, Donald R. Lehmann d a Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder CO 80309, USA b Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA c Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham . Modified.
They have an entire section in the issue devoted to questions of replication in psychology (I'll have a bit more to say about that later .
The study must self-label with the term 'replication' in the title and/or abstract. Comparison of findings can be found in Table 4 .
This differs from the operational recipe that Zwaan et al.
The IRIS Replication Award (Download PDF version) £300 will be awarded every two years to a published (or accepted) self-labelled replication using materials held on IRIS. There are different types of replication. I agree that the line dividing direct and conceptual replication is not clear, but I do think there is a boundary there. In exact replications, the original experimental design is followed as exactly as possible, while a conceptual replication attempts to answer the same research questions using an adapted methodology. Conceptual replication means that researchers re-test the same theoretical idea or hypothesis repeatedly, but use different populations, different ways of manipulating variables, different ways of measuring variables, or using different study designs. First, there is a type called "exact .
Download scientific diagram | From a narrow focus on replication to a broader focus on substantiation from publication: From replication to substantiation: A complexity theory perspective | In . A Preregistered Conceptual Replication Study Isa Rutten, Wouter Voorspoels, Sara Steegen, Peter Kuppens and Wolf Vanpaemel University of Leuven, BE Corresponding author: Wolf Vanpaemel (wolf.vanpaemel@kuleuven.be) We present a fully preregistered, high-powered conceptual replication of Experiment 1 by Smith, Tracy, and Murray (1993). This is a useful research activity for advancing under-standing, but many studies with this label are not replications by our definition. Conceptual replications. And, ultimately, a lack of trust is what lies at the heart of current debates. Types of replication studies range from exact replications to conceptual replications that aim to test a theory beyond the confines of an original study (Hüffmeier, Mazei, & Schultze, 2016; Lykken, 1968; Makel & Plucker, 2014). Abstract.
A direct replication reproduces every single detail of the original study. This study conducted a conceptual replication of Fernbach et al.'s (2019) work with a nationally representative sample of internet users in China. Arguably, most typologies of replication make more or less fine-grained distinctions between direct replication (which closely follow the original study to verify results) and conceptual replications (which deliberately alter important features of the study to generalize findings or to test the underlying hypothesis in a new way). Direct, partial, and conceptual replications are all eligible. Rosenthal and Rosnow (1969) explain that demand. A. Johnson analyzed the meta-analytic data and drafted the manuscript.
Once a study has been conducted, researchers might be interested in determining if the results .
The New Study: A Conceptual Replication A. For this study we set out to create a conceptual replication for the theory of risk aversion in judgements and decision making. Conceptual replications- Conceptual replication is when research is conducted by using different methods to repeat the original study.
Conceptual replication study data were collected and analyzed by E. L. Funk, F. L. Elezovic, and J. C. A. Finley and were interpreted by those authors in addition to J. Study 1-Fischhoff (1975) Study 2-Slvoic & Fischhoff (1977) Study 3-Fischhoff (1975) Replicability. Conceptual replications are even more important than exact replications in furthering our understanding of behavior. First of all, it would be useful to define exactly what we mean by replication. There are two main forms of replication: direct replication and conceptual replication (Picho et al., 2016).
Recall that "to
For me, a direct replication stick as close to the original method as possible. J. There is no clear dividing line between direct and conceptual replications but what I am advocating are not conceptual replications. This replication was done by using aspects of both Kahneman and Tversky's (1979) original work and McDougle, Boggess, Crossley, Parvin, Ivry and Taylor's (2016) novel findings. (2018), who investigated whether productive collocation knowledge - a linguistic feature known to be indicative of high-level L2 proficiency - developed between the B2 and C1 levels of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages scale in second-language (L2) French. First, the original study was very 'top-down' in nature, in that it emphasised the . In the current study, we examined and compared the e. The Role of Linguistic Alignment on Question Development in Face‐to‐Face and Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication Contexts: A Conceptual Replication Study - Kim - 2020 - Language Learning - Wiley Online Library Aspects of a previous study that may be varied include but are not limited to the population (of students, teachers, and/or schools); The replication uses a similar conceptual structure but incorporates changes in procedures and independent variables. This study used a different method to assess social behavior and randomly sampled 50 people from the population in Canada, where the study was conducted. By doing so .
Individual-level interventions still ground domestic
Objectives and Hypotheses. A. First, our main objective is to test the reliability of our previous finding by replicating the study. A conceptual replication retests the original hypothesis but . This could be important information given a research culture that is more inclined toward data exploration than what is indicated in published papers (Janiszewski and van Osselaer 2021). (2012). Counterfactual thinking, or contemplation of "what could have been," influences facial expressions of Olympic medalists.
The study will examine how fidelity, engagement, and working alliance are related to outcomes, and it will .
(2005) research fails to replicate.